Visitreno Forum Index Visitreno
Visitreno.com's message board
There's a lot of information on the
MAIN SITE
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Lucky's sportsbook operating a Ponzi scheme?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Visitreno Forum Index -> Reno Comments
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
lvbear584



Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Posts: 140

PostPosted: Feb Mon 09, 2009 5:03 pm    Post subject: Lucky's sportsbook operating a Ponzi scheme? Reply with quote

Lucky's operates the sportsbooks at the following locations:

Grand Sierra Resort
Reno

Casino Fandango
Carson City

Red Lion Hotel & Casino
Elko

Plaza Hotel & Casino
Downtown Las Vegas

Terrible's Hotel & Casino
Flamingo & Paradise, Las Vegas

Terrible's Primm Valley Casino Resorts
Primm

Terrible's Town Casino
Pahrump

----------------------------------------------------

February 9, 2009

Nevada Gaming Control Board
Enforcement Division
555 East Washington Avenue #2600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

Request for emergency audit of Lucky’s Race & Sportsbook; possible violation of Regulation 22.040: Reserve requirements, and other regulations

It appears that this licensee is frequently operating without sufficient money on hand to pay winning patrons, in apparent violation of Regulation 3.050.1, which states:

No license will be issued for use in any establishment until satisfactory evidence is presented that there is adequate financing available to pay all current obligations and, in addition, to provide adequate working capital to finance opening of the establishment.

There have been at least five incidents within the last thirty days of Lucky’s at Plaza Las Vegas and Lucky’s at Terrible’s Las Vegas being unable or unwilling to promptly pay winning patrons. Patrons have had to wait as long as eight hours to get paid. In at least one case known to me, a patron was asked to return to Plaza in “a couple of days” to get paid. One patron at Terrible’s was told to “mail in your ticket if you want to get paid.” He subsequently was paid after Board intervention. Most of these failures to promptly pay were for relatively small amounts, no more than four figures. It is hard to understand a sportsbook trying to operate with less than $10,000 in cash on hand to pay winning patrons.

In addition, there has been an apparent attempt by Lucky’s to cheat a patron by deliberately misgrading a Super Bowl prop in favor of the side that had the least action. The resulting patron complaint is presently being handled by Agent Willie Waters.

The totality of circumstances would indicate that Lucky’s simply no longer has adequate capital to operate, and may now be essentially operating a Ponzi scheme, transferring a day’s incoming revenues to other locations to pay off previous winners. If this is correct, and is allowed to continue, the damage to patrons and the embarrassment to the industry and the State of Nevada will be significant when the scheme eventually unravels.

Action by the Board pursuant to Regulation 3.050.2 would appear to be appropriate:

The commission or the chairman of the board may require a licensee to provide security in the form of a reserve for the payment of all amounts held by the licensee on the patrons’ behalf, all amounts held by the licensee for the account of the patrons, all amounts owed by a licensee but unpaid to gaming patrons, future wages, salaries or other obligations, either as a condition precedent to issuance or renewal of any license or at any other time the commission or chairman determines that such requirement would be in the public interest. The security required shall in all respects, other than amount, comply with the requirements and provisions of the reserve made applicable to race books and sports pools by Regulation 22.040.

Of particular relevance is Regulation 22.040.8:

A book must calculate its reserve requirement each day. In the event a book determines that its reserve is not sufficient to cover the calculated requirement, the book must, within 24 hours, notify the chairman of this fact in writing and must also indicate the steps the book has taken to remedy the deficiency.

Based on the frequency of delayed payments, it is reasonable to suspect that this regulation is not being complied with by Lucky’s. Otherwise, there would be sufficient cash on hand at its locations to pay winning patrons, unless it lacks the cash, in which case it is in violation of the reserve requirement itself.

The circumstances causing Lucky’s recent mistreatment of winning patrons cry out for a Board investigation. Please initiate it as quickly as possible and advise.

-------------------------------------------------------

More about Lucky's and recent nastiness:

http://www.thebeargrowls.com/?p=244
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
RenoLady



Joined: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 316

PostPosted: Feb Tue 10, 2009 8:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wonder if we'll see more of this sort of thing with casinos operating with less, but not wanting to give up the action. It surprises me that it's taking so long to investigate. Insolvency is determined pretty quickly. How much are you supposed to have? open the vault.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Visitreno Forum Index -> Reno Comments All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group